Structure of papers regarding items for Executive Council

Papers that are submitted to the Cabinet Legislation Committee (LEG) seeking approval for the submission of regulations to the Executive Council must follow the format set out below. The form indicates the headings to be used. Each heading must appear in the submission. Write "not applicable" if the heading is not relevant to the regulations.

All papers submitted to LEG must also comply with the relevant requirements and format of standard Cabinet papers, such as the 10 page guideline on the length of papers, and the requirement for an executive summary if the body of the paper is more than four pages long.

In Confidence
[In Confidence is the security classification generally used for draft regulations and bills]

 

Office of the Minister of [xx]

 

Cabinet Legislation Committee

 

Title - use the full title of the regulations unless the paper deals with several sets of regulations.

Proposal

1   Briefly state what is proposed in the paper.

Executive Summary

2   An executive summary must be provided if the paper, including appendices that must be read to understand the issues, is more than 4 pages long, or the paper is particularly complex.  An executive summary should be a few paragraphs in length and succinctly explain the main issues.

Policy

3   Give a succinct statement of the policy or proposal to be implemented by the regulations. Summarise any significant background information, including any relevant financial matters, and give references to previous Cabinet and Cabinet committee decisions.

4   If the regulations are entirely routine, and do not require any new policy decisions, including a clear statement to that effect.

5   If changes to fees are proposed, give the following information:

  • current and proposed fees (including GST), and the percentage change;
  • date on which the fee was last changed; and
  • justification for the new figure, including reference to the Cabinet minute approving the change.

6   If the regulations have the effect of amending, suspending or otherwise altering a provision in any statute, explain the effect on the statute and why the amendment is necessary.

Timing and 28-day rule

7   Set out the timing for the making and coming into force of the regulations. If a waiver of the 28-day rule is sought, briefly explain the appropriate grounds upon which the waiver is sought, i.e. why the breach of the 28-day rule is acceptable.

Compliance

8   Indicate whether the regulations comply with each of the following, with reasons if the regulations do not comply (list each sub-heading):

9   Refer to any statutory prerequsites that may exist for the making of the regulations.  Briefly describe the requirements and confirm that they have been met.

Regulations Review Committee

10   Indicate whether there may be grounds for the Regulations Review Committee to draw the regulations to the attention of the House under Standing Order 310.

Certification by Parliamentary Counsel 

11  State that the draft regulations were certified by parliamentary counsel as being in order for submission to Cabinet. If parliamentary counsel have noted any reservations, set these out.

Other matters (optional heading)

12  Set out any other matters which Ministers should be aware of when considering the draft regulations.

Regulatory impact analysis

13  State whether a Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) was prepared in accordance with the necessary requirements, and was submitted at the time that Cabinet or Cabinet committee approval of the policy relating to the regulations was sought.  Include references to the minutes of previous consideration by Cabinet.

14  In the unlikely event that a RIS is required for the proposal and has not previously been submitted to Cabinet or a Cabinet committee at the policy approval stage, it should be attached to the paper, and the paper should provide:

  • an agency opinion on the quality of the impact analysis, which is a statement on whether the reviewer considers that the information and analysis summarised in the RIS meets/does not meet/partially meets the quality assurance criteria, and comment on any issues that have been identified in relation to any of the dimensions of quality set out in the quality assurance guidance;
  • Ministerial certification on whether the proposal(s) in the paper is consistent with the expectations set out in the Government Statement on Regulation.

15  If an RIS is not required because an exemption applies, specify why the exemption applies.

16  If a RIS is required but has not been developed, specify the reason why.

Publicity

17  Briefly set out what steps, if any, are to be taken to publicise the new regulations.

Consultation

18  Briefly set out the consultation that has taken place in the course of developing the policy and draft regulations. Papers on regulations must comply with standard consultation requirements for all submissions to Cabinet and Cabinet committees.

19  In particular:

Recommendations

20  The standard wording for recommendations is:

       I recommend that the (name of Cabinet committee):

1     note that on (date) the (name of Cabinet committee) agreed to (brief summary of policy decision(s)) [Cabinet minute reference];

2     note that the (title of regulations) give effect to the decision referred to in paragraph 1 above; 

3     note that the (title of regulations) come into force on (date);

4     authorise the submission to the Executive Council of the (title of regulations).

  

If a waiver of the 28-day rule is sought, include the following recommendations in place of recommendation 3 above:

3     note that a waiver of the 28-day rule is sought:

3.1   so that the regulations can come into force... (include information about timing, for example "as soon as possible");

3.2   on the grounds that (set out the grounds for the waiver of the 28-day rule, ie why a breach of the 28-day rule is acceptable);

4     agree to waive the 28-day rule so that the regulations can come into force on (date);

 

If the regulations can only be made once a statutory prerequisite has been met, include these recommendations after recommendation 2 above:

3     note that (describe the statutory prerequisite, eg section x of the x Act requires that the responsible Minister be satisfied that consultation with x has occurred before recommending the making of an Order in Council under section x);

4     note the advice of the Minister of x that this requirement has been met;
 

 



[signature of Minister]
[title of Minister]

_____/_______/______ [field for the date of signing]

Related pages

The approval process for regulations

The Executive Council

Accompanying documentation for regulations going to the Executive Council

The 28-day rule and examples of acceptable grounds for waiving it